For Approval: Open Source Software Alliance License
sean at chittenden.org
Sat Sep 27 07:08:04 UTC 2003
> > > Your license is fine, once the ambiguities are squeezed out, and
> > > I recommend that the OSI approve it.
> > Are you apart of the approval process? *doesn't remember reading
> > that part*
> As an individual, no; as a member of this list, yes.
Ah, ok... didn't know if you had special political power over the OSI
review process or not.
> > Well, from what I can tell, any conclusion that isn't the GPL
> > seems to indicate a flaw in whoever's argumentation. :) -sc
> It so happens that my latest piece of free software was issued under
> the Academic Free License. I wound up dual-licensing it under the
> GPL because the AFL's patent poison-pill is GPL-incompatible.
AFL patent poison-pill? -sc
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss