For Approval: Open Source Software Alliance License
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Sat Sep 27 06:29:58 UTC 2003
Sean Chittenden scripsit:
> > Your license is fine, once the ambiguities are squeezed out, and I
> > recommend that the OSI approve it.
> Are you apart of the approval process? *doesn't remember reading that
As an individual, no; as a member of this list, yes.
> Well, from what I can tell, any conclusion that isn't the GPL seems to
> indicate a flaw in whoever's argumentation. :) -sc
It so happens that my latest piece of free software was issued
under the Academic Free License. I wound up dual-licensing it
under the GPL because the AFL's patent poison-pill is GPL-incompatible.
"You're a brave man! Go and break through the John Cowan
lines, and remember while you're out there jcowan at reutershealth.com
risking life and limb through shot and shell, www.ccil.org/~cowan
we'll be in here thinking what a sucker you are!" www.reutershealth.com
--Rufus T. Firefly
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss