galactus at stack.nl
Sat Nov 22 18:22:58 UTC 2003
Mitchell Baker wrote:
> Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> >No, it's the FUD that the GPL is 'viral' and therefore must
> >be avoided in business environments. It is very well possible
> >to combine GPL-licensed software with proprietary applications.
> >You just have to make the right architectural decisions.
> Yes, but "just" making the "right architectural decisions" is not easy.
> Sometimes almost impossible if the code is already written. And
> sub-optimal in far more situations. It takes nothing away from the GPL
> to admit that it can be very awkward for use it in business settings.
True. I didn't want to create the impression that it's easy.
You have to "think through" what will happen and what parts
subsequently will be open sourced, and whether that is
acceptable from a business (and legal) point of view.
> And in large complex environments, making the right architectural
> decisions is difficult enough on purely technical grounds. Adding
> another lawyer adds yet more complexity and increases the chance of
> failure all around.
Adding another _lawyer_? Surely you meant 'layer'? :-)
Arnoud Engelfriet, Dutch patent attorney - Speaking only for myself
Patents, copyright and IPR explained for techies: http://www.iusmentis.com/
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss