is it just summertime?
jcowan at reutershealth.com
Wed Jul 9 16:14:32 UTC 2003
Russell Nelson scripsit:
> Is it just summertime, and people are outside enjoying themselves?
> Otherwise, I have to wonder why there have been no comments on
This is basically OK, but has two troubling points. The term "depends for
its intended functionality on" used in section 3a (and similar language
elsewhere) is not defined and is AFAIK unprecedented. A web browser
depends for its intended functionality on the correct operation of various
HTTP servers, but cannot be thereby brought under the license terms of
those servers (and a good thing too). I think this should be stricken
in favor of "contains" (already present) or "is a derivative work of"
(equally undefined, but at least familiar).
In addition, it is not clear that section 2a is an implicit patent grant,
and even less clear that there is an implicit patent grant for users of
derivative works. I suggest an explicit patent grant be added.
This license is obviously open source.
Henry S. Thompson said, / "Syntactic, structural, John Cowan
Value constraints we / Express on the fly." jcowan at reutershealth.com
Simon St. Laurent: "Your / Incomprehensible http://www.reutershealth.com
Abracadabralike / schemas must die!" http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss