an open source model code: osd 2002

[David Johnson]

Rod Dixon wrote:
> ...what I am unsure of is whether we should be satisfied
> with the status quo or whether we should amplify Article 2 with something
> more than just saying the source code should not be deliberately
> obfuscated. Poorly expressed source code need not be deliberately
> obfuscated to end run the objective of what it means to provide "open"
> access to the source code. Agree?

That's a tough one. But you might be able to expand upon: "The source 
code must be the preferred form in which a programmer would modify the 
program." This could be interpreted to mean that the source must be 
readily modifiable without having to first translate or filter it.

David

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3