OSD modification regarding what license can require of

[Bruce Perens]

From: David Johnson <david at usermode.org>
> You don't have the APSL quite right. Clause 2.2d only applies to "Your 
> Deployed Modifications."
> 
> Clause 2.2d merely requires a prominent notice of the license for binary only 
> deployments. It can only be triggered by the creation of a derivative work, 
> since compilation is considered derivation.

I prefer this to the proposed GPL change. A whole lot. Is there anything
I should know before I write Eben and Richard to tell them that?

	Thanks

	Bruce
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3