request for approval of APPOSL - going by the numbers.

[Matthew C. Weigel]

On Wednesday, March 6, 2002, at 04:59 p, dave sag wrote:

> 2. APOSSL is closest to the Apache licence.  The Apache licence is 
> insufficient for our needs as our mission is to promote pronoia, 
> and pronoic attitudes in the minds of developers who embrace and 
> extend our software.  the specific differences are:

Why?

Much as with your attempt to backtrack from bad faith, you are
attempting to answer this without substance.

What makes you think that free software is not a conspiracy to improve
life, and given that, what makes you think that free software developers
are not actively intending to take part in this conspiracy?

How does your license succeed at promoting this sense?

weigel at libcom.com

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3