question about MPL
john smith
jsmith at cecioni.com
Wed Jan 23 17:24:03 UTC 2002
Hallo, there is a chance that a software library of ours
will be released as open-source. We want to strike a balance
between the needs of die-hard free software programmers
and the needs of third-parties who would like to integrate our
software with their own without too much trouble.
The goal is large adoption by developers and industry alike.
For this reason, the MPL (Mozilla Public License) seems to be
the one that makes most sense.
Unfortunately, there is a potential third-party integrator
that does not seem to be too happy with MPL. Their arguments:
===========================================================
The primary concern is that in order to satisfy contractual
conditions with certain key customers we have to indemnify
both ourselves and them against IPR liability, and the more
code shipments (including code snippets/drivers etc) we make,
the more it costs. This insurance is very expensive because
the the potential liability is high and the risk is hard to
quantify. Releasing source code as required would actually
cost us quite a lot of money (for a relatively small company).
The secondary issue is that there might be some IP concerns
for us in releasing code for modifications needed to integrate
the softwareX code with the softwareY code.
Such modifications could be very specific, so they might
reveal details about the internals that we would not want
to make public. This is however, a lesser concern because
we could mitigate it by performing any needed modifications
in a neutral way.
===========================================================
Some question:
- is this a common case?
- should we be thinking of a dual license for developers and
third parties? (we don't think this is wise for a few reasons)
- should we create a modified version of MPL for the purpose?
how? how would deelopers react to yet another OS license?
ideas and opinions are welcome.
thank you
John
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list