discuss: rtx-2000 open software license

[John Cowan]

wri scripsit:
> 
> [ please discuss this license.  Is he a candidate for using the
> Academic License?  -russ ]

I don't have the slightest idea what point 2 means:

#  All distribution of this Software and evolved derivations of
# this Software shall embrace the RTX-2000 RTOS Open License to meet
# the current version of the 'Open Source Definition' published by Open
# Source Initiative.

It sounds like all derivatives must be licensed under the same license,
which is virality without copyleft, which makes very little sense.

-- 
John Cowan                                jcowan at reutershealth.com
At times of peril or dubitation,          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Perform swift circular ambulation,        http://www.reutershealth.com
With loud and high-pitched ululation.
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3