Legal soundness comes to open source distribution

[David Johnson]

On Tuesday 13 August 2002 09:12 pm, Russell Nelson wrote:

> But anyway, feel free to propose language.  I've had my shot, and been
> shot down.

I'll number this one zero for traditional reasons:

0) The possessor of a copy of the software must not be required to enter into 
or become party to any agreement or license in order to make use of the 
software, including the preparation of the software for subsequent use.

Any problems with this?

-- 
David Johnson
___________________
http://www.usermode.org
pgp public key on website
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3