MPL style license and commercial products
jcowan at reutershealth.com
Tue Apr 30 23:52:54 UTC 2002
Ann W. Harrison scripsit:
> In your opinion, have they violated the terms of the license?
> If the source can be redistributed without penalty, have they
> still violated the terms of the license?
In my opinion, they are in compliance. Clause 3.2 requires
distribution of source only to those who receive binary forms.
John Cowan <jcowan at reutershealth.com> http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss