MPL style license and commercial products

[John Cowan]

Ann W. Harrison scripsit:

> In your opinion, have they violated the terms of the license?
> If the source can be redistributed without penalty, have they
> still violated the terms of the license?

In my opinion, they are in compliance.  Clause 3.2 requires
distribution of source only to those who receive binary forms.
IANAL, TINLA.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan at reutershealth.com>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3