GPL vs APSL (was: YAPL is bad)
Karsten M. Self
kmself at ix.netcom.com
Wed Sep 26 01:21:55 UTC 2001
on Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:08:26PM -0400, Greg London (greglondon at oaktech.com) wrote:
> % OSD 2:
> % The program must include source code, ...
> % When some [program] is not distributed with
> % source code, there must be a well-publicized
> % means of obtaining the source code
> % preferably, downloading via the Internet without charge.
> (B) somewhat implies public distribution by mentioning "internet" and
> "well-publicized". but it is possible to distribute a binary and give a
> URL that requires a password for those you allow to download the source
> code. and such a way could be "well-publicized" even though the
> password is not public.
...which negates "means" if the well publicized site isn't such.
Karsten M. Self <kmself at ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Home of the brave
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ Land of the free
Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the License-discuss