GPL vs APSL (was: YAPL is bad)

[Karsten M. Self]

on Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:08:26PM -0400, Greg London (greglondon at oaktech.com) wrote:
> % OSD 2:
> % The program must include source code, ...
> %
> % When some [program] is not distributed with
> % source code, there must be a well-publicized
> % means of obtaining the source code 
> %
> % preferably, downloading via the Internet without charge.

> (B) somewhat implies public distribution by mentioning "internet" and
> "well-publicized".  but it is possible to distribute a binary and give a
> URL that requires a password for those you allow to download the source
> code.  and such a way could be "well-publicized" even though the
> password is not public.

...which negates "means" if the well publicized site isn't such.

IANAL, TINLA.

Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself at ix.netcom.com>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?              Home of the brave
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/                    Land of the free
   Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA!  http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire                      http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20010925/7781ea0e/attachment.sig>