YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?)
Karsten M. Self
kmself at ix.netcom.com
Tue Sep 25 07:28:50 UTC 2001
on Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 08:58:30AM +0200, Chris Gray (chris.gray at acunia.com) wrote:
> "Karsten M. Self" wrote:
> > on Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:56:55PM +0100, phil hunt (philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk) wrote:
> > >
> > > What if, as part of the process of approving a new licence, the
> > > proposer of the license had to write a rationale of why a new license
> > > is necessary, and why no existing OSI-certified licence exists
> > > that does the job.
> > >
> > > Is this a good idea?
> > I think so.
> Doesn't step (2) of
> already imply this?
IIRC, the change in submission processes occured as a result of the
Karsten M. Self <kmself at ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Home of the brave
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ Land of the free
Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the License-discuss