YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?)

[Chris Gray]

"Karsten M. Self" wrote:

> on Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:56:55PM +0100, phil hunt (philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk) wrote:
>
> >
> > What if, as part of the process of approving a new licence, the
> > proposer of the license had to write a rationale of why a new license
> > is necessary, and why no existing OSI-certified licence exists
> > that does the job.
> >
> > Is this a good idea?
>
> I think so.
>

Doesn't step (2) of <URL:http://www.opensource.org/docs/certification_mark.html#approval>
already imply this?

Chris


--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3