YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?)
chris.gray at acunia.com
Tue Sep 25 06:58:30 UTC 2001
"Karsten M. Self" wrote:
> on Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:56:55PM +0100, phil hunt (philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk) wrote:
> > What if, as part of the process of approving a new licence, the
> > proposer of the license had to write a rationale of why a new license
> > is necessary, and why no existing OSI-certified licence exists
> > that does the job.
> > Is this a good idea?
> I think so.
Doesn't step (2) of <URL:http://www.opensource.org/docs/certification_mark.html#approval>
already imply this?
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss