YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?)
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Mon Sep 24 10:16:52 UTC 2001
Rob Myers scripsit:
> > ...it introduces a novel obligation to disclose one's private affairs.
> > The licence must not attach any obligations to usage of the covered code
> > that is entirely internal to the non-public affairs of the individual or
> > organisation using it.
> Well, that's the GPL out for starters. :-)
I'm not sure what the smiley face means in this connection, but the GPL
imposes no such obligation to the world at large. If you distribute a
derivative work, you are obliged to distribute the original *to the recipients
of the derivative work*; likewise, if you distribute binaries, you are obliged
to distribute source *to the recipients of the binaries*.
If you distribute only to your partner, or to the people of your organization,
or to Bill Gates, then your further obligations involve distributing only
to your partner/your people/BillG.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss