Is inherited class a derivative work?
Michael Beck
mbeck1 at compuserve.com
Thu Oct 25 10:17:09 UTC 2001
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhkramer at fast.net [mailto:rhkramer at fast.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 09:27
> To: mbeck1 at compuserve.com
> Re: "IMHO the author gives the user implicitly the right to create a
> subclass and override the abstract methods."
>
> I'm not so sure -- creating abstract methods is useful for
> the original
> version of the program, to be overridden by derived classes in the
> original. Simply the presence of abstract classes does not mean that
> the author intends for others to also derive from those
> classes. (IMHO, and in my limited knowledge of C++).
Interesting view. I don't know, but you could be right. The author could claim
that the abstract methods/classes are there for future enhancements.
Michael
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list