Fails OSD #1. [Re: OSD compliant shareware]

John Cowan cowan at
Wed Nov 14 11:21:01 UTC 2001

Bruce Perens scripsit:

> I haven't read the decision in MAI vs Peak,

In brief: it said that a computer maintenance company (neither owner nor licensee)
couldn't run proprietary OS software, already installed, for hardware testing
purposes, because that involved making copies; the 117 safe harbor
is only for owners.

The part of the DCMA that overrode this is not being reviewed.

John Cowan               cowan at
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan
license-discuss archive is at

More information about the License-discuss mailing list