IBM Public License
Karsten M. Self
kmself at ix.netcom.com
Sun May 13 07:03:44 UTC 2001
on Fri, May 11, 2001 at 10:22:08AM -0700, Lawrence E. Rosen (lrosen at rosenlaw.com) wrote:
> The Common Public License is the same as the IBM Public License with the
> name "IBM" removed. IBM submitted that license directly to OSI for approval
> because it helped solve a problem that people were having -- specifically,
> the ability to use the IBM Public License without having to apply for
> modification merely to replace IBM's name with the name of the new licensor.
> We encourage other licensors to submit such "template" licenses wherever
> /Larry Rosen
Kudos to IBM.
Very strong kudos.
Karsten M. Self <kmself at ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the License-discuss