Multi-licensing

[Rodrigo Barbosa]

A quite simple question.
I see several people talking about dual licensing. I think it's a little
less them what I like, and usualy, on most of the software I write, this
is the license I use:

===============LICENSE===============
Any OSI (www.opensource.org) compliant/approved license.
Just go to the OSI site, and pick your favorite license
===============LICENSE===============

The point is, am I in any danger doing this ?
Should I put, explicitily, any statement about "NO WARRANTIES", or the
about statement is enough ?

Thanks

-- 
 Rodrigo Barbosa                   - rodrigob at bh.conectiva.com.br
 Conectiva S/A			   - Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
 "Quis custodiet ipsos custodiet?" - http://www.conectiva.com/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20010625/20bbbf07/attachment.sig>