trademarked logos and GPL
Lawrence E. Rosen
lrosen at rosenlaw.com
Fri Jan 26 00:04:32 UTC 2001
> The following is arguably legal advice, but all of this information is
> available on the UPSTO web site. And if you can't believe the
> United States
> government, who can you believe??? OPENSOURCE may not be lost as a TM to
> the opensource community. On the federal register the term OPENSOURCE is
> registered for the following goods and services only: (a) financial
> services, namely, on-line mortgage brokerage services; on-line mortgage
> aggregation services; lending services. There were two other applications
> for OPENSOURCE, but both have been abandoned. Yes, the mark may
> be generic
> or descriptive without secondary meaning, but I'm not sure about that. I
> mean, I'm only a patent lawyer; give me a break.
The preceeding is *not* legal advice. I'm sorry if I've made people
paranoid about speaking up. That wasn't my intention.
/Larry Rosen
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list