trademarked logos and GPL

Lawrence E. Rosen lrosen at
Wed Jan 24 18:32:21 UTC 2001

I appreciate and sign on to Rod Dixon's answer.  Well phrased!  Thanks.
/Larry Rosen

Rod wrote:

> Matt,
> I think the point was to say that some posts were not making a distinction
> between saying "that license is not legally enforceable in any
> court in the
> U.S." and "some of the terms of that license are not consistent with open
> source principles;" the latter is fine, the former should be avoided. The
> programmers have much more to add to the discussion than the
> lawyers, in my
> opinion. It's the programmers who present the clever hypothetical and the
> real-life  programming situations that make the discussions interesting. I
> do hope you stay.
> Rod

More information about the License-discuss mailing list