Request: Publication of this discussion

kmself at kmself at
Wed Jan 17 21:25:05 UTC 2001

on Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 02:58:21PM -0500, Ralf Schwoebel (puzzler at wrote:
> Hi *,
> we think that the discussion about IPL reached a point where the board
> will tell us, what we could do.
> Until then we have to continue to work and I kindly ask for the
> permission of everybody who posted to "license-discuss" on that
> matter, that we put a prominent link to these mails on our

Linking should not be an issue, Ticketmaster v. Microsoft and RIAA v.
DeCSS notwithstanding.  Permision to link to or publish my own posts,
with attribution, granted.

> BEFORE somebody downloads the sources and state the uncertainty of the
> approval "Open Source".

It's not uncertain.  It hasn't been granted.  In all likelihood with
your current license, it won't be.

Karsten M. Self <kmself at>
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?       There is no K5 cabal
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the License-discuss mailing list