W3C license

[Matthew C. Weigel]

Why is this license
(http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice-20000612) not listed on
the OSI list of approved licenses
(http://www.opensource.org/licenses/)?

Actions the W3C would apparently like to take - including hosting Amaya
on sourceforge.net - depend upon this approval, which has been pending
for over a year.

Although I have no stake in this license, it seems it should be a
higher priority and easier decision than some of the other licenses
recently approved, since they actually need the approval to continue
with some of their plans.
-- 
 Matthew Weigel
 Research Systems Programmer
 mcweigel at cs.cmu.edu ne weigel at pitt.edu

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3