David Johnson <david at usermode.org> writes: > Considering a GPL-compatible v2 of the QPL wasn't good enough. Eh? Who would not have been satisfied with a genuinely GPL-compatible QPL? -- __ \/ o\ Employ me! Cryptology, security, Perl, Linux, TCP/IP, and smarts. /\__/ paul at cluefactory.org.uk http://www.cluefactory.org.uk/paul/cv/