Free documentation licenses
John Cowan
cowan at locke.ccil.org
Wed Nov 29 05:41:25 UTC 2000
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Rick Moen wrote:
> At work, I've tried to explain the matter by saying it's best to think
> of a composite work as not _having_ a licence, per se: The individual
> modules bear licences. The resulting composite, then, either is or is not
> legally distributable, depending on how those licence terms interact.
Well, that's not the whole truth either. I could take a bunch of
BSD modules, create a derivative work, and license the result under
the GPL. Or under a proprietary license, for that matter.
Of course, this is somewhat pointless, since you could do exactly
the same thing with the same modules and license it under a different
license.
--
John Cowan cowan at ccil.org
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
--Douglas Hofstadter
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list