How To Break The GPL
RSchilling at affiliatedhealth.org
Mon Mar 6 20:39:53 UTC 2000
Good point with respect to Copyright law itself. But, the GPL makes
specific reference to deriverative works, and work "based on" GPL licensed
See my previous post . . .
Half the internet suing the other half . . . now that's a funny picture.
The scary thing is, it's plausable, with everyone suing over domain name
usage. Sometimes I think the only cap on something like that is the
expense, limited time of lawyers. Geeez . . .
From: David Johnson [mailto:arandir at meer.net]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2000 9:27 PM
To: Schilling, Richard; license-discuss at opensource.org
Subject: RE: How To Break The GPL
On Fri, 03 Mar 2000, Schilling, Richard wrote:
> Generally, if the program Alice writes for Bob references *anything* in
> GPLed library, Bob's program could be considered a deriverative work. If
> the program Alice write does not reference anything in the GPLed library,
> there is no point in linking to it in the first place.
In terms of programming and computerese, you might possibly have a point,
the definition of "derivative" is according to copyright law. If references
made something a derivative, then half the internet would be suing the other
More information about the License-discuss