How To Break The GPL
Justin Wells
jread at semiotek.com
Fri Mar 3 22:44:09 UTC 2000
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 04:51:03PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Ah, but then you raise this question: If the GPL is an ordinary
> contract, where's the consideration?
There's lots of consideration:
-- fame from becoming well known as the author of a free software work
-- expectation that you will receive further copyrighted material in
return, from someone who contributed to your project (this is
explicitly mentioned as being of value in US title 17, the
copyright act).
-- the service of distributing your copyrighted work to other people
for you so that they can provide one of the above
-- personal satisfaction in knowing that others use your software
Consideration can be anything of value, and all of the above seem to
be things of value. I don't think a court would have a hard time
finding consideration.
Also, is the GPL a copyright *grant* or a copyright *license*? A grant
assigns ownership rights to other people. A license simply gives
everyone some permission to use it.
I think the GPL is a *license* and probably depends on there being
some consideration.
I am not a lawyer, so take all this with a grain of salt.
Justin
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list