new license to review
Creed Erickson
creed at apple.com
Sat May 8 02:50:11 UTC 1999
>Hurray. What would be ideal, is to develop common
>set of underlying clauses and algebraic rules for
>combining those clauses. Say that a decomposition
>lead to 26 clauses, A..Z,
>
>Then each OS license would be defined in
>terms of these clauses. So that
>
>Artistic = A, B, C, F, G, Y
>BSD = A, C, D, F, Y
>GNU = B D, F, G, H, I,
>
>And then you have rules which define how
>the licenses combine (as you combine the
>source code they are licensed with)
>
>I started to do this about a year ago,
>it _could_ be done, provided many of the
>groups participated in a more unified
>licensing mechanism. It seems OS would
>be a good way to do this.
I like the concept--plug and play licensing. Alas, my view is too jaded and cynical to see it as a workable solution. Corporate counsel would react to this how? I suspect some--perhaps many--would feel threatened by a lack of 'value-add' on their part and dismiss C, H and W yielding "alternate language", superfluous changes, and YAOSL. (Yet Another...)
---
Creed Erickson (mailto: creed at apple.com)
Deckhand, H.M.S. Beagle
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list