[CAVO] [License-discuss] SF - LAFCO open source voting draft
Allison Randal
allison at opensource.org
Wed May 27 14:55:13 UTC 2015
On 05/26/2015 02:54 PM, Brian J. Fox wrote:
> It *is* right, by the definition that we’re using for Open Source.
It is very close to right. A license is open source if it complies with
the Open Source Definition. A license might be open source, but not yet
reviewed the by OSI. We use the set of licenses approved by the OSI as a
stand-in, because they're a clearly defined set that we've carefully
reviewed for compliance with the OSD. But, it's important to remember
that the principles of the OSD are the core of it all.
Allison
More information about the CAVO
mailing list