[beyond-licensing] Fwd: Re: Panel Discussion at OSCON EU?

[Deb Nicholson]

Hi all,

> As time runs short, if like to see if we can go with who we have on board
already plus possibly one more.
>
> Karen "from charitable"
> Duane "from corporate"
> Deb Bryant "OSI board member - public policy"
> Stefano (if he is willing) "from education and the Debian
development/contibutor community"
>
> As chair of the working group, I'd be happy to moderate.
> Thanks,
> Deb
>
> On May 23, 2016 2:30 PM, "Deb Nicholson" <deb at eximiousproductions.com>
wrote:
>>
>> Breadth would seem incomplete to me without a staff person from a
charitable non-profit. We could probably get an industry/board member to
cover two hats at once -- especially on this list. :)
>>
>> I'm also a bit wary of the word developer in this context, since it
tends to mean code-only contributors and would prefer the more general word
"contributor" for that perspective.
>>
>> On May 23, 2016 2:17 PM, "O'Brien, Duane" <duobrien at paypal.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I like the look of #3 as well.
>>>
>>> My first swipe at a panel with some breadth would be to include a
developer, a board member, someone from a corporation, and someone in the
devrel or community space.
>>>
>>> What does a wide breadth of panelists look like to the rest of you?
>>>
>>> From: <baconandcoconut at gmail.com> on behalf of Deb Nicholson <
deb at eximiousproductions.com>
>>> Date: Monday, May 23, 2016 at 11:04 AM
>>> To: Karen Sandler <karen at sfconservancy.org>
>>> Cc: Beyond Licensing Working Group <beyond-licensing at opensource.org>,
"O'Brien, Duane" <duobrien at paypal.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [beyond-licensing] Panel Discussion at OSCON EU?
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I just reread the thread (some things got sick in spam ) and realized
you may be proposing something more specific/general about the Beyond
Licensing work group.
>>>
>>> I see a few possibilities.
>>> 1) Report on the working groups' work which may be tricky depending on
how much progress/consensus we've had by October. At the very least, it
would have to be a fairly general proposal at this stage.
>>>
>>> 2) Have a second town hall session focused on getting European input.
We'd need OSI buy-in and this one might the most sense as a co-located
event.
>>>
>>> 3) Have several different stakeholders discuss what they see as
important for the community as we move "Beyond Licensing." I'd want to make
sure we got a wide breadth of panelists for this to avoid any feeling that
we (some supposed cabal) are usurping the conversation.
>>>
>>> My favorite is number three. I'm here in NY with Deb Bryant who is also
willing be involved if we need her.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Deb
>>>
>>> On May 23, 2016 1:48 PM, "Deb Nicholson" <deb at eximiousproductions.com>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would also be happy to participate. Maybe Deb Bryant could share her
text from the OSCON Austin panel for tweaking?
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Deb
>>>>
>>>> On May 23, 2016 1:22 PM, "Karen Sandler" <karen at sfconservancy.org>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm happy to participate if that's helpful :)
>>>>>
>>>>> karen
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2016-05-23 13:14, O'Brien, Duane wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (My bad on the bounce, I emailed the bounced address.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 23, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Allison Randal <allison at opensource.org>
wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This message seems to have bounced from the mailing list, not sure
why.
>>>>>> Sending it on...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/23/2016 01:02 PM, O'Brien, Duane wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We’ve got about six-ish hours left until the CFP for OSCON EU
closes. Is
>>>>>> there interest in with working group to put together a panel
discussion?
>>>>>> We could present some of the topics we’ve been discussing, any work
we
>>>>>> complete to date, take questions, etc. I would be happy to shepherd
the
>>>>>> submission through the process, but we’ll need too pull together a
>>>>>> speaker list and an abstract in the next few hours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any takers?
>>>>>> -D
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> beyond-licensing mailing list
>>>>>> beyond-licensing at opensource.org
>>>>>>
https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beyond-licensing
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> beyond-licensing mailing list
>>>>> beyond-licensing at opensource.org
>>>>> https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beyond-licensing
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/beyond-licensing_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20160523/c24587fa/attachment.html>