<p dir="ltr">Hi all,</p>
<p dir="ltr">> As time runs short, if like to see if we can go with who we have on board already plus possibly one more.<br>
><br>
> Karen "from charitable" <br>
> Duane "from corporate"<br>
> Deb Bryant "OSI board member - public policy"<br>
> Stefano (if he is willing) "from education and the Debian development/contibutor community"<br>
><br>
> As chair of the working group, I'd be happy to moderate. <br>
> Thanks,<br>
> Deb <br>
><br>
> On May 23, 2016 2:30 PM, "Deb Nicholson" <<a href="mailto:deb@eximiousproductions.com">deb@eximiousproductions.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Breadth would seem incomplete to me without a staff person from a charitable non-profit. We could probably get an industry/board member to cover two hats at once -- especially on this list. :)<br>
>><br>
>> I'm also a bit wary of the word developer in this context, since it tends to mean code-only contributors and would prefer the more general word "contributor" for that perspective. <br>
>><br>
>> On May 23, 2016 2:17 PM, "O'Brien, Duane" <<a href="mailto:duobrien@paypal.com">duobrien@paypal.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> I like the look of #3 as well. <br>
>>><br>
>>> My first swipe at a panel with some breadth would be to include a developer, a board member, someone from a corporation, and someone in the devrel or community space.<br>
>>><br>
>>> What does a wide breadth of panelists look like to the rest of you?<br>
>>><br>
>>> From: <<a href="mailto:baconandcoconut@gmail.com">baconandcoconut@gmail.com</a>> on behalf of Deb Nicholson <<a href="mailto:deb@eximiousproductions.com">deb@eximiousproductions.com</a>><br>
>>> Date: Monday, May 23, 2016 at 11:04 AM<br>
>>> To: Karen Sandler <<a href="mailto:karen@sfconservancy.org">karen@sfconservancy.org</a>><br>
>>> Cc: Beyond Licensing Working Group <<a href="mailto:beyond-licensing@opensource.org">beyond-licensing@opensource.org</a>>, "O'Brien, Duane" <<a href="mailto:duobrien@paypal.com">duobrien@paypal.com</a>><br>
>>> Subject: Re: [beyond-licensing] Panel Discussion at OSCON EU?<br>
>>><br>
>>> Hi,<br>
>>> I just reread the thread (some things got sick in spam ) and realized you may be proposing something more specific/general about the Beyond Licensing work group.<br>
>>><br>
>>> I see a few possibilities. <br>
>>> 1) Report on the working groups' work which may be tricky depending on how much progress/consensus we've had by October. At the very least, it would have to be a fairly general proposal at this stage. <br>
>>><br>
>>> 2) Have a second town hall session focused on getting European input. We'd need OSI buy-in and this one might the most sense as a co-located event.<br>
>>><br>
>>> 3) Have several different stakeholders discuss what they see as important for the community as we move "Beyond Licensing." I'd want to make sure we got a wide breadth of panelists for this to avoid any feeling that we (some supposed cabal) are usurping the conversation.<br>
>>><br>
>>> My favorite is number three. I'm here in NY with Deb Bryant who is also willing be involved if we need her.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Cheers, <br>
>>> Deb<br>
>>><br>
>>> On May 23, 2016 1:48 PM, "Deb Nicholson" <<a href="mailto:deb@eximiousproductions.com">deb@eximiousproductions.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> I would also be happy to participate. Maybe Deb Bryant could share her text from the OSCON Austin panel for tweaking? <br>
>>>> Cheers, <br>
>>>> Deb<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On May 23, 2016 1:22 PM, "Karen Sandler" <<a href="mailto:karen@sfconservancy.org">karen@sfconservancy.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> I'm happy to participate if that's helpful :)<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> karen<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> On 2016-05-23 13:14, O'Brien, Duane wrote:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> (My bad on the bounce, I emailed the bounced address.)<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> On May 23, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Allison Randal <<a href="mailto:allison@opensource.org">allison@opensource.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> This message seems to have bounced from the mailing list, not sure why.<br>
>>>>>> Sending it on...<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> On 05/23/2016 01:02 PM, O'Brien, Duane wrote:<br>
>>>>>> Hi all.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> We’ve got about six-ish hours left until the CFP for OSCON EU closes. Is<br>
>>>>>> there interest in with working group to put together a panel discussion?<br>
>>>>>> We could present some of the topics we’ve been discussing, any work we<br>
>>>>>> complete to date, take questions, etc. I would be happy to shepherd the<br>
>>>>>> submission through the process, but we’ll need too pull together a<br>
>>>>>> speaker list and an abstract in the next few hours.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Any takers?<br>
>>>>>> -D<br>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>>>> beyond-licensing mailing list<br>
>>>>>> <a href="mailto:beyond-licensing@opensource.org">beyond-licensing@opensource.org</a><br>
>>>>>> <a href="https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beyond-licensing">https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beyond-licensing</a><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>>> beyond-licensing mailing list<br>
>>>>> <a href="mailto:beyond-licensing@opensource.org">beyond-licensing@opensource.org</a><br>
>>>>> <a href="https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beyond-licensing">https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beyond-licensing</a><br>
</p>