[License-review] Python licenses: Python-2.0.1, PSF-2.0, CNRI-Python-GPL-Compatible

Richard Fontana rfontana at redhat.com
Mon Aug 31 15:38:05 UTC 2026


On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 11:16 AM McCoy Smith <mccoy at lexpan.law> wrote:
>
>
> On 8/31/2026 7:57 AM, Max Mehl wrote:
>
>
>
> I’d be happy to assist with getting PSF-2.0 approved if OSI feels it would be useful to have all portions of an approved license approved.
>
>
> OSI typically only reviews licenses if a submitter (typically, but not always, the steward) asks for it.

I'm still not sure what happened historically but FWIW in 2011 Van
Lindberg (then I believe GC of the PSF) actually did request separate
review of both some version of the "stack" license (not clear whether
this was what we'd now label Python-2.0 or Python-2.0.1 SPDX-wise) as
well as what we'd now label the PSF-2.0 license.
https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2011-May/001263.html

Anyway I would support having OSI review of PSF-2.0, since it is in
use by a considerable number of projects, mostly in the Python
ecosystem, as a standalone license and is generally assumed to be open
source.

Richard



More information about the License-review mailing list