[License-review] For Approval: OpenMDW License Agreement, versions 1.1 (OpenMDW-1.1)
Pamela Chestek
pamela at chesteklegal.com
Sun Aug 30 21:50:08 UTC 2026
McCoy, you asked for a definition of "software freedom" and Moming's
response is similar to my thoughts:
On 8/29/2026 11:10 PM, Moming Duan wrote:
>
> Here is a simple test of my own: *if 99% of the world's models were
> released under license X, would our ecosystem be better off?*
>
My premise is that the everyone benefits from a software commons, so,
does the license encourage or discourage sharing? "Software freedom" is
the ability to do anything you want with the software. A few
conditions/impairments are allowed because they indirectly encourage the
growth of the software commons - giving credit (copyright
notice/attribution), telling people what their rights are (the license),
the appropriate distribution of risk (the "as-is" rep and disclaimer of
warranty), and compulsory sharing (copyleft). The balance is very
delicate. It's questionable whether the GPLv3, and then the AGPL,
contribute to the health of the open source software commons because
they are commonly used as the antagonist to encourage people to get a
commercial license instead. It does, though, seem that lever isn't as
successful anymore, since people are more willing to comply with the
copyleft licenses and these two licenses are more often being used for
their intended benefit.
This, I think, is the piece that's missing from the OSD. We've seen the
OSD gamed when it has been formally met but it is nevertheless clear
that the license is designed to give one entity superior rights in the
software or has mechanisms that will discourage the use of the software.
"Providing software freedom" as a requirement is a check on that.
Pam
Pamela S. Chestek
Chestek Legal
4641 Post St.
Unit 4316
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
+1 919-800-8033
pamela at chesteklegal.com
www.chesteklegal.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20260830/d0c0890a/attachment.htm>
More information about the License-review
mailing list