[License-review] Python licenses: Python-2.0.1, PSF-2.0, CNRI-Python-GPL-Compatible
Pamela Chestek
pamela at chesteklegal.com
Thu Aug 27 17:14:50 UTC 2026
I hate to be a pill about it, but we need a way to manage the requests.
Can you send a separate email for each license you would like
considered? There is also a page describing the information the OSI
likes to have for each submission, although in this case I expect they
can be lax. https://opensource.org/licenses/review-process But a
separate email for each license will be helpful, particularly since it
looks like some of the licenses you wanted considered have already been
reviewed.
Pam
Pamela S. Chestek
Chestek Legal
4641 Post St.
Unit 4316
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
+1 919-800-8033
pamela at chesteklegal.com
www.chesteklegal.com
On 8/21/2026 10:35 PM, Nico Rikken via License-review wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Good to see a familiar faces here.
>
> I didn't look back far enough to notice the submissions by Max. Great
> that Max beat me to it and it already got started. And with support of
> Python!
>
> Important that PSF-2.0 will also be included in the review as it is
> used stand-alone and is also part of Python-2.0.1.
>
> I see how the nesting of licenses and the subtle differences can be
> confusing. I did some diffing myself to verify the statement I made in
> my initial email. I think the diff link by Max is well-made:
> https://gist.github.com/mxmehl/d3e8694e30fc94cc6517529b5441ebc5/revisions?diff=split&w
>
> To me the subtle differences with previously approved licenses only
> come down to choice of law, which only improved to be more generic. For
> FSF it was the reason to consider these licenses not only free, but
> also GPL-compatible. So it should be obvious they comply with Open
> Source definition. I do of course recognize that it needs a formal
> review.
>
> Anything Max and I can do to move this forward?
>
> Kind regards,
> Nico Rikken
>
> _______________________________________________
> The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Communication from the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
>
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org
More information about the License-review
mailing list