[License-review] For Approval: OpenMDW License Agreement, versions 1.1 (OpenMDW-1.1)

[Rob Landley]

On 8/25/26 16:54, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> I don't understand how you get to this conclusion. Are you arguing that 
> every single piece of content ingested to train a LLM must be explicitly 
> licensed? If so, how do you square it with the US fair use principles 
> and the text and data mining exception in the EU?

So you want a license for the cases where you don't NEED a license, with 
a termination provision walling you out if challenged.

Rob