[License-review] Please review revised ModelGo licenses

[Pamela Chestek]

On 5/17/2025 10:10 PM, Moming Duan wrote:
> However, the intention behind the output provision is simply to remind 
> sub-users at the /first generation/to respect attribution.

In your licenses that are not sublicenseable, every user is a first 
generation user. So the question is whether a person who has received a 
model that was trained on the Output of a ModelGo-licensed model has 
entered into a license with you. It's a possible outcome under US law, 
which can be very generous in finding that there has been contract 
formation, although I think it is a lower probability outcome.

Pam


Pamela S. Chestek
Chestek Legal
PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW MAILING ADDRESS
4641 Post St.
Unit 4316
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
+1 919-800-8033
pamela at chesteklegal
www.chesteklegal.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20250518/1839a6f2/attachment.htm>