[License-review] License Approval Request: BSD-3-Clause-Open-MPI

Carlo Piana carlo at piana.eu
Thu Jun 19 13:45:29 UTC 2025


I agree.

The added language, referring only to third parties patents, seems an extension of the liability disclaimer clause, therefore it is not a patent-carve-out provision.

I don't see much problem here and the submission is impeccable and eloquent.

K


----- Messaggio originale -----
> Da: "Josh Berkus" <josh at berkus.org>
> A: "License submissions for OSI review" <license-review at lists.opensource.org>, "McCoy Smith" <mccoy at lexpan.law>
> Inviato: Giovedì, 19 giugno 2025 2:24:59
> Oggetto: Re: [License-review] License Approval Request: BSD-3-Clause-Open-MPI

> All,
> 
> Having looked over this BSD variant, this seems unquestionable
> OSD-compliant.  I have no opinions on the utility of the added language,
> but it doesn't pose any problems for developers.
> 
> --
> Josh Berkus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily
> those of the Open Source Initiative. Communication from the Open Source
> Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
> 
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org


More information about the License-review mailing list