[License-review] AGPL timeline

[VanL]

I only looked at the repo, not at the releases. My apologies.

__________________________
Van Lindberg
van.lindberg at gmail.com
m: 214.364.7985

On Sat, Jan 4, 2020, 3:22 PM Keith Zubot-Gephart <keithzg at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat Jan 4 03:18:16 UTC 2020 VanL <van.lindberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > You are right, copyleft-next is engaging in a public drafting process,
> and
> > has not submitted the license to any authority. On the other hand, it
> also
> > has a big "DO NOT USE AS A LICENSE" written across the top of the draft,
> so
> > it is hard to know if this is meant to be more than a drafting exercise.
>
> This is incorrect; I'm guessing you're looking at the current draft,
> which is NOT the release. The original 0.1.0 release of the
> copyleft-next license was back in January of 2013; the most recent
> release is 0.3.1, from 2016-04-29.
>
> All the different releases can be seen here:
>
> https://github.com/copyleft-next/copyleft-next/tree/master/Releases
>
> Note that even the oldest release, 0.1.0, does NOT have the
> > THIS IS A DRAFT. DO NOT USE AS A LICENSE.
> header, because it is not a draft, and was indeed intended to be usable
> as a license at that point (and I believe at least a few small projects
> did so).
>
> _______________________________________________
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
>
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20200104/01097735/attachment-0001.html>