[License-review] AGPL timeline & why cautious processes with real-world testing are better (was Re: For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4))

[Bradley M. Kuhn]

VanL wrote this evening:
>  comply with all the unwritten and ever-changing rules, including the newly
>  articulated "requires 6+ years of public use" requirement that you are
>  proposing.

I don't make the rules; in this context, I'm just an individual interested in
FOSS licensing sharing my opinion.  Your license is unique and enters
unprecedented ground that no FOSS license covered before in 30+ years.  It's
entirely reasonable to give unprecedented scrutiny to a copyleft license that
reaches well beyond what has been previously contemplated for copyleft.
--
Bradley M. Kuhn - he/him

Pls. support the charity where I work, Software Freedom Conservancy:
https://sfconservancy.org/supporter/