[License-review] AGPL timeline & why cautious processes with real-world testing are better (was Re: For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4))

[Henrik Ingo]

Hi Van

I feel like this refers to something I wrote earlier:

On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 8:23 PM VanL <van.lindberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> Moreover, there have been at least a couple people stating on this list that they are interested in using the CAL as soon as it is approved. Is that not a sign of interest by non-Holo licensors?

I just want to clarify for the record, that I'm not currently active
in any projects where a network copyleft license would be relevant. I
did however make a statement that I'm one of those people who
generally favors copyleft and increasingly network copyleft, and that
I see CAL as a great license that I'd probably choose if I'm working
on such projects in the future. In short, I just wanted to say I think
it improves and modernizes on the state of the art, and I look forward
to having it available in our arsenal of licenses.

For example, until some years ago I was dabbling with various e-voting
projects. CAL would be a perfect licenses if I ever returned to that
area of interest.

henrik
-- 
henrik.ingo at avoinelama.fi
+358-40-5697354        skype: henrik.ingo            irc: hingo
www.openlife.cc

My LinkedIn profile: http://fi.linkedin.com/pub/henrik-ingo/3/232/8a7