[License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4)
Kevin P. Fleming
kevin+osi at km6g.us
Thu Feb 13 17:03:36 UTC 2020
The CAL would not obligate the provider of the service to provide
recordings made by person A to person B.
Person B can make all the requests they want, CAL or no-CAL :-)
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:00 PM VanL <van.lindberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:51 AM Eric Schultz <eric at wwahammy.com> wrote:
>> Sorry to bring this up at a late stage but I just thought of a situation I wanted clarification on. Let's say a voice recognition provider using the CAL allows users to confidentially choose to submit their voice recordings to improve the quality of recognition. Is there any sort of dynamic here where one user would be able to request access to all of the other users confidential recordings? My hunch is no but it's a little bit of a different situation than I had seen considered on the list.
> The CAL would not enable a person to a request access to other people's recordings.
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
More information about the License-review