[License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4)

[Josh Berkus]

On 2/7/20 11:30 AM, Eric Schultz wrote:
> That said, given the process we have and the discussion so far, I lean
> slightly towards this license being OSD compliant (and FSD compliant for
> that matter). But I'm also not going to be shocked if there's some
> unexpected consequences from this license.

I am *certain* there will be unexpected side effects.  That's been true
for every significant license we've passed.

My criterion is whether there will be substantial freedom-promoting
reasons to use the license, and am fairly confident that the answer is
"yes".

-- 
Josh Berkus