[License-review] The Vaccine License

[Carlo Piana]

On 30/10/19 17:18, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Carlo,
>
>> Therefore, excluding ignorance, I believe that is at most an exercise to
>> provoke reactions, rather than a genuine attempt to having a license
>> approved. It is my opinion and I affirm my right to express it. I also
>> believe I have expressed it in a polite form.
> While that's certainly true, I do think we should take this submission
> and use it to create a documented example on opensource.org, one we can
> point to.  Because this is not the first unrelated-condiditons license
> we've received, and it won't be the last.
>
I totally agree.

I discovered this morning that keep using the same wording to reject the
same idea over and over; this means either that I am getting old or that
the argument has been repeated too many times. Perhaps, both.

Let's get rid for good of this idea that open source *licensing* is
tasked with fixing something else than the bad effects of proprietary
software (or perhaps not even them).

All the best,

Carlo