[License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4)

VanL van.lindberg at gmail.com
Sat Dec 7 05:32:34 UTC 2019

But as has been pointed out by several people, the scenario you describe
could happen with any license.  Thus it is not about the license, it is
about the situation you are imagining.

Van Lindberg
van.lindberg at gmail.com
m: 214.364.7985

On Fri, Dec 6, 2019, 9:51 PM Bruce Perens via License-review <
license-review at lists.opensource.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019, 6:19 PM VanL <van.lindberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> You are arguing about imagined future business conduct.
> It's valid to argue about questions like "what is the intent of the
> terms", "what are the implications of the terms in practice", "how would
> unfortunate outcomes of the terms play out".
> _______________________________________________
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20191206/b7b8c81e/attachment.html>

More information about the License-review mailing list