[License-review] For Legacy Approval: OpenLDAP Public License

Brendan Hickey brendan.m.hickey at gmail.com
Fri Aug 16 21:10:20 UTC 2019


On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, 12:26 Smith, McCoy <mccoy.smith at intel.com> wrote:

> *>>From:* License-review [mailto:
> license-review-bounces at lists.opensource.org] *On Behalf Of *Simon Phipps
> *>>Sent:* Wednesday, August 14, 2019 2:46 AM
> *>>To:* License submissions for OSI review <
> license-review at lists.opensource.org>
> *>>Subject:* Re: [License-review] For Legacy Approval: OpenLDAP Public
> License
>
>
>
>
>
> >>To my eyes the key difference is the updateability clause:
>
>
>
> The OpenLDAP Foundation may revise this license from time to time.
> Each revision is distinguished by a version number.  You may use this
> Software under terms of this license revision or under the terms of any
> subsequent revision of the license.
>
>
>
> Yes, that is a substantive difference over BSD 3-clause.
>

We should regard upgrade clauses skeptically, particularly when the license
steward is the only user of the license. This language could be used to
generate a proprietary fork if the steward saw fit. The GPL at least claims
that revisions will be in the spirit of the original, AGPL linking clause
notwithstanding.

Brendan

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20190816/3e085a3d/attachment.html>


More information about the License-review mailing list