[License-review] NOSA 2.0 rears its head again: (was: RE: [Non-DoD Source] test, please ignore (UNCLASSIFIED)) (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)]

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

I'm good at poking sleeping bears... :)

Honestly though, I've talked with the NASA guys about NOSA 2.0, and they're as confused as I am as to why NOSA 2.0 was rejected.  I think if they were given a point by point list of what they need to fix, then they could start working on the problems, or, if they can't be fixed, accept the fact that it can't be fixed and move on.  Can we get a clear, complete list of what's wrong with NOSA 2.0?

Thanks,
Cem Karan

-----Original Message-----
From: License-review [mailto:license-review-bounces at lists.opensource.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Masson
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 4:03 PM
To: License submissions for OSI review <license-review at lists.opensource.org>
Subject: Re: [License-review] [Non-DoD Source] test, please ignore (UNCLASSIFIED)

All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser. 


________________________________



Now that is how you get the list going again!!!

On Feb 16, 2018 3:58 PM, "Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)" <cem.f.karan.civ at mail.mil < Caution-mailto:cem.f.karan.civ at mail.mil > > wrote:


	CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
	
	Yes, and we're all waiting for a list of reasons on why NOSA 2.0 got rejected... ;)
	
	Thanks,
	Cem Karan
	
	-----Original Message-----
	From: License-review [Caution-mailto:license-review-bounces at lists.opensource.org < Caution-mailto:license-review-bounces at lists.opensource.org > ] On Behalf Of Richard Fontana
	Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 3:51 PM
	To: license-review at lists.opensource.org < Caution-mailto:license-review at lists.opensource.org > 
	Subject: [Non-DoD Source] [License-review] test, please ignore
	
	All active links contained in this email were disabled.  Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.
	
	
	
	
	----
	
	tap tap tap is this thing on?
	
	_______________________________________________
	License-review mailing list
	License-review at lists.opensource.org < Caution-mailto:License-review at lists.opensource.org > 
	Caution-Caution-http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org < Caution-http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org > 
	
	CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
	
	_______________________________________________
	License-review mailing list
	License-review at lists.opensource.org < Caution-mailto:License-review at lists.opensource.org > 
	Caution-http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org < Caution-http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org > 
	

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED