[License-review] For Legacy Approval: TOPPERS License

Simon Phipps simon at webmink.com
Tue Jun 16 13:07:00 UTC 2015


On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Yutaka MATSUBARA <yutaka at ertl.jp> wrote:

>
> There is a reasonable amount of historical precedent that mandatory
>> notification requirements make a license not open source.
>>
>> However, as noted in this thread, this question is moot because people
>> can just do a) instead.
>>
>
> Yes. Are there any questions or suggestions?
>

What happens when there is no documentation supplied with the item?

S.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20150616/0192e0d5/attachment.html>


More information about the License-review mailing list