[License-review] Request for approval of the Non-Coercive Copyleft Licence (NCCL) 1.0

[Thorsten Glaser]

Carlo dixit:

>PS: I have expressed an opinion in the past that any copyleft license
>which do not ensure access to modified source code is almost totally
>moot, at best it's a shareware license. The same applies here.

In addition, the BSD crowd will *also* not touch that code, because
it’s, well, copyleft. We’d provide source code of course, but won’t
be happy with the rest.

So, in effect, it’s probably useless to both the copycentre and co‐
pyleft factions, plus creates its own island if not GPL-compatible.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
(gnutls can also be used, but if you are compiling lynx for your own use,
there is no reason to consider using that package)
	-- Thomas E. Dickey on the Lynx mailing list, about OpenSSL