[License-review] note about crayon license submissions [was Re: License drafting quality and process]

[Luis Villa]

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:21 AM, John Cowan <cowan at mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> Josh Berkus scripsit:
>
>> (1) Crayon license submitter (CLS) emails their "clever" idea for a new
>> license to this list.
>>
>> (2) We point out some of the shortcomings in the license and reject it.
>>
>> (3) CLS becomes indignant and accuses us of personal enmity and/or
>> incompetence.
>
> As soon as this happens, drop-kick CLS from the list.  There's no reason
> to tolerate personal remarks of that sort.  That way at least we don't
> have to see (4-6) at all.  The outcome is the same, but burnout is
> perhaps reduced.

To be clear, this is now official policy. Submissions to
license-review that aren't quite compliant with the submissions policy
will be politely rejected until you come back with a better one.

Luis