[License-review] Request for Approval : Modular Open-source Software License (MOSL)

[Bruce Perens]

Oh, come on Thorsten. The license permits a charge for source code that 
isn't related to the cost of copying. You know full well that is not in 
compliance with OSD #1 and will never be seriously considered.

On 09/25/2012 04:31 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Bruce Perens dixit:
>
>> I'm afraid you missed "The license shall not require a royalty or other fee for
>> such sale" in the Open Source Definition.
> His draft does not require one. (In fact, the draft is neutral on that
> issue.)
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bruce.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 266 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120925/31c81ee4/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4460 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120925/31c81ee4/attachment.p7s>